PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO DISCUSS RALSTON CREEK ESTATES

  

 Possible action concerning approval of a final plat for Ralston Creek Estates Phase II will be one of the topics to be discussed by the Brenham Planning and Zoning Commission on Monday

Also to be presented will be the 2015 City of Brenham Election, and a presentation of the Administrative Report.

The Planning and Zoning Commission will meet on Monday, March 2 at 5:15 on the Second Floor City Hall Council Chambers at 200 W Vulcan.

 

What’s your Reaction?
+1
0
+1
0
+1
0

3 Comments

  1. Let’s see if anyone in the city of brenham actually cares what’s going on here. Once again we have a city council that approves and finalizes plans of development. So if this subdivision is not finalized yet, then how is the engineer able to already put sewer and plumbing lines in for lots and a subdivision that hasn’t even been approved yet by our council? There’s too much favoritism going on and it’s sad that we elect officials that allow this to happen. Probably the worst thing is city publishes the finalization of the subdivision on the Saturdays paper and having the meet on Monday morning so the public has no chance to take action. Once again this is poor execution on the city of brenham and the engineer developing land without it being finalized. He should be fined and the council should be warned because there are higher officials that can take appropriate action in the state level not obey laws. Kyle Kendall

    1. Mr. Kendall, what exactly is your complaint here? I note that you disparage our elected officials, yet you do not level any specific charge. Any land owner can engage a plumber to come trench and run plumbing across their property, but that owner may not subdivide and sell property according to his plumbing whims without the approval of his neighbors as interpreted by the Planning and Zoning Commission, so it appears to me that any construction work in advance of formal approval is likely a gamble, at best. There is a procedure to follow to gain approval for subdivision, and I haven’t seen any evidence that this property owner has failed to follow said procedure. If you seek controversial decisions to question, why not instead question the apparent lack of sidewalks alongside the S. Chappell Hill St. re-alignment south of E. Stone St.?

      1. Mr. Knothole. I think you missed the reasoning of my comment. The city is allowing style craft to work on a neighborhood that hasn’t been approved. This isn’t the first time this has happend but it needs to be the last. Imagine if you improved your house without the proper permits or approval? You would get fined and who knows what else. But this is a reoccurring issue allowing companies to start improving and building without the proper permits or approval. Too much favoritism to say the least. The list could go on but something needed to be said about this new subdivision that’s already being worked on without being finalized.

Back to top button