BRENHAM CITY COUNCIL SIGNALS FAVOR OF NEW SMOKE/VAPE SHOP RESTRICTIONS
The Brenham City Council expressed willingness today (Thursday) to move forward with a set of amendments to city code that would limit where smoke and vape shops can operate within the city.
Stephanie Doland presents a set of proposed code
amendments to the city council on Thursday
regarding the operation of smoke and vape shops.
Councilmembers were agreeable to the
amendments, which would put new restrictions on
where those businesses can locate in the city.
During a work session where no vote was taken, councilmembers reviewed and voiced approval of amendments that would create specific definitions for smoke and vape shops, restrict them to certain business and industrial zoning districts, and adopt distance requirements between them and homes, schools, parks, churches, hospitals and other smoke or vape shops presently operating.
The council’s feedback comes after last month’s Planning and Zoning Commission meeting where commissioners recommended holding off for now on making any decisions locally, as state legislators are looking at several bills on the matter.
City of Brenham Development Services Director Stephanie Doland said the intent of the amendments is to move beyond classifying smoke and vape shops as general retail use, so that the city can have more say in where they operate.
Doland also reiterated that any legislation passed by the state would not encompass zoning district restrictions, as that would fall to the local level.
currently operating in Brenham, along
with what zoning district they are
located in.
(City of Brenham)
The proposed text amendments would only allow smoke and vape shops to locate in the B-2 Commercial, Research and Technology District and the Industrial District, meaning they could not operate in the B-1 Local Business and Residential Mixed Use District or in the downtown districts that include the B-3 Historical Central Business District or B-4 Neighborhood Business District. Existing smoke and vape shops in those districts would be grandfathered, but they could not expand without a specific use permit granted by the commission and the city council.
Lounge uses, such as cigar or hookah lounges, would not be impacted by the regulations since they are meant for consumption by adults 21 and older and are not solely for the sale of e-cigarettes or tobacco products.
The proposed distance requirements would put smoke and vape shops at least 300 feet from single-family residential uses and 1,000 feet from public and private schools, day care centers, public parks, religious facilities, public hospitals, and other smoke or vape shops currently in business. City Manager Carolyn Miller requested to add language to include private hospitals, as there are not many public hospitals anymore.
Mayor Atwood Kenjura said he felt it appropriate for the city to explore this further, as more and more cities are regulating smoke and vape shops or banning them outright and lawmakers are now picking up the discussion.
Mayor Pro Tem Clint Kolby said he agreed that it would be worth it to advance discussion on this, but that he also felt it would be fine to wait until after the Texas Legislature concludes. Councilmembers Shannan Canales and Albert Wright responded that more smoke or vape shops could move into town during that time, before the city finishes its work on the amendments.
Councilmember Adonna Saunders said she was okay with moving forward with the amendments and making changes as needed. Councilmember Dr. Paul LaRoche III also said he was agreeable to proceeding, but wants to avoid banning smoke and vape shops and turning into the “moral police.”
The item will now head back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for a vote.
Click here to view the agenda packet for Thursday's meeting.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: RSS
Perhaps it is time, considering the obvious trend gaining momentum in America, that these type of unsavory businesses ARE banned outright.
When something does not actually contribute to the community’s positive welfare it is a negative impact, pure and simple.
While an outright ban makes sense to me, I am sure others may not feel the same way.
These businesses may not necessarily be unsavory, but they do not project a family friendly environment either.
Either way I think they should be restricted to an area away from downtown at the very least.
These types of shops in other towns do attract the less desirably type of folks.
So why not ban smoke and vape shops from Brenham?
City council needs to really think this through.
What is meant exactly by the use of the terms “ less desirably type of folks?” Less desirable too who exactly? Everyone’s money should be the same doesn’t make a difference who you are a business is there to provide a product and a customer to purchase it I don’t see a vape or smoke shop catering to any certain type of person specifically besides someone who enjoys a good smoke no matter the variety just like a liquor store .”And should be restricted to an area away from downtown?”….. but yet we welcome establishments that serve alcohol of different varieties don’t make sense ….make it make sense
My opinion of less desirably may be different from yours but it you want those folks near you that is your decision. I for one do not frequent establishments whose sole purpose is to sell alcohol. Not my cup of tea. And establishments like vape shops are not what I want in areas where families are likely to be. That seems to be the problem, money is the main driver and if people are so focused on money than my opinion is they don’t have their priorities straight. As far as I am concerned there is no such thing as a good smoke, a nasty habit in my humble but accurate opinion. Confused you do seem to be confused and that is fine we can all have our own opinions that are different and that is what makes this country so great. Good Day.
Do you want to ban alcohol? Are we going to impress our moral beliefs on all the things that we consider negative? I would argue that a vape shop is less negative than many of the fast food shops populating our town. We have an obesity epidemic that is crushing our health system. Is it time to tell people what to eat? We live in a free society and for the most part people should be allowed to live their lives as they deem fit. For better or worse.
Ok…, so let’s ban liquor stores next. Something tells me that won’t be happening though even though alcohol is one of the biggest killers in America.
Excellent idea! While we’re at it, let’s get rid of all those disgusting convenience stores selling beer and cigarettes. Let’s also ban all the fast food restaurants selling that nasty, unhealthy garbage and making everybody fat. Oh, let’s not forget, all those cookies; cakes, chips and other junk food at the grocery stores. Go to get rid of that stuff too. I mean, if we’re going to go all “nanny state”, why stop at just vape shops?
Since your doing this because of health concerns I guess? So if that is true you really ought to look at the donut shops and have them locate outside the city limits too! Fact is processed flour and sugar is way worse for your health than some smoke. Next time you have craving for some donut cuisine think about what’s is the truth and what is not why ban one and keep the other well just politics right! People with full stomachs have short memories. If its not broke leave it be genius.
Take a look around you next time a few are definitely unsavory in town and have gotten into plenty of trouble like underage selling both in shop and employees selling at the schools, and many other issues hell one shop doesn’t think the state law is anything and believes the age of sale for thc is 18! due to the federal laws but in fact despite that Texas still triumphs in that legal battle. These are headshops not dispensaries, they hold no medical purposes other than to get you high and come back, hell one shop sells counterfeit stuff I know because I called the company of said products to do some digging even then thc0 is banned kinda due to what it was reclassified as so having that on the back of a thca would raise some issues ?♂️ and questions. I don’t think it needs to go but just legalize it or regulate this stuff more ?♂️