BRENHAM CITY COUNCIL TO TAKE UP MOU FOR MARKET SQUARE DEVELOPMENT

  

A memorandum of understanding with the developer of a residential and commercial project is among today’s (Thursday) topics of discussion for the Brenham City Council.

The proposed MOU is for Market Square, a 51-acre mixed use development between Market Street and Highway 290 that would include multi-family residential, commercial, retail, hospitality and restaurant properties.

If approved, the MOU would create the foundation for a Chapter 380 agreement between the city and Market Square to reimburse qualified infrastructure costs to the developer.

The agreement would follow the guidelines set forth by a policy that will also be considered by the council today, concerning revenues generated by projects within the city’s Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ).  The policy refers to reimbursement for infrastructure costs incurred by private developers for public improvements that enhance the value of taxable property within the zone and are of general benefit to the city.

Per the proposed MOU, Market Square expects the total property value of the fully developed project to surpass $133.8 million.  The total cost of the infrastructure to support the project, including water, wastewater, roads and drainage, is estimated at $7.5 million.

As the projected appraised value of the fully developed land tract will exceed $100 million, 8 percent of the appraised property value can be reimbursed for qualified infrastructure costs.  The maximum qualified infrastructure reimbursement for the project is $10 million.  Only tax increment revenues generated by the properties on the land tract can be used to fund reimbursement.

The Chapter 380 agreement will end after the city has made its 20th year of reimbursement, once Market Square receives total reimbursement equal to the amount of qualified infrastructure costs, or once Market Square receives compensation equal to the maximum infrastructure reimbursement cap.

Also at today's meeting, the council will:

  • Act on purchasing $741,440 in equipment for the City of Brenham Street Department using certificates of obligation.
  • Consider terminating the 2002 interlocal agreement between the city and Washington County providing for subdivision regulation within the City of Brenham’s extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) and approving a new interlocal agreement between the city and county. The new agreement would establish the city as the authority of subdivision regulation only on property included on the city’s adopted annexation plan.  Properties not included on the annexation plan and located in the city’s ETJ will be reviewed and approved through the Washington County Commissioners Court and would not be reviewed by the city’s Development Services Department or the Planning and Zoning Commission.  County Commissioners approved the proposed agreement on March 8th.
  • Hold a public hearing and potentially approve a request from the Brenham Housing Authority to adjust the zoning for the 1.2 acre property at 1003 Hasskarl Drive that currently serves as the site of the community center at Fairview Terrace. The zoning change from R-2 Mixed Residential Use to B-1 Local Business Mixed Use would allow BHA to expand the allowable uses for possible future development of the community center.
  • Consider an amendment to the professional services agreement with Strand Associates, Inc. for Hurricane Harvey mitigation projects. The amendment covers language changes, scope of work modifications and sequence alignment when compared to the final General Land Office contract.  No monetary amounts have changed.
  • Consider bids for janitorial services for city facilities.

The council will meet at 1 p.m. at Brenham City Hall.

Click here to read the agenda packet for today's meeting.

What’s your Reaction?
+1
0
+1
0
+1
0

One Comment

  1. Brenham has had a Market Square shopping center for many years now, and it is within a mile of the proposed new Market Square development. This will infringe upon the name that the current owners of the existing Market Square have been using, and will confuse the public about which one is which. City Council, please take this into consideration during deliberations.

Back to top button